Definition
Amicus curiae brief
An amicus curiae brief is a submission to a court setting out a legal position.
Show MoreIn March 2009, ECCHR partner lawyer Gonzalo Boye filed a criminal complaint against six former US officials of the Bush administration, among them former government lawyers John Yoo and Jay Bybee. The aim: to ensure the so-called “Bush Six” are held accountable for breaches of international law. They are accused of having aided and abetted crimes of torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
In the proceedings, ECCHR represents German citizen Murat Kurnaz, who was detained and tortured in Guantánamo from 2002 to 2006. The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) in New York also supports the case.
The principle of universal jurisdiction was part of Spanish law until 2014. A law reform in that year, however, means that the Spanish judiciary can now prosecute international crimes only if the perpetrators are Spanish citizens or live in Spain. After six years of criminal investigations, Spain’s National Court therefore decided in July 2015 to close the investigations into US torture in Guantánamo.
The subsequent complaint submitted by ECCHR and CCR to the Spanish constitutional court was rejected in March 2019. In its decision, which is final, the court ignored evidence that indicated the involvement of Spanish suspects. With this decision, Spain has missed its opportunity to take a leading role in the fight against US torture. The “Bush Six” have never faced legal proceedings for their actions. The options of filing a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights and the UN are now being explored.
The absolute prohibition of torture is one of the central and universally applicable norms of international law. Since 2001, the US has ignored this fundamental principle in its counter-terrorism operations and has kidnapped and tortured persons suspected of involvement in terrorism.
The “Bush Six” played a crucial role in this violation of the fundamental prohibition of torture. The complaint filed against them in Spain detailed how the six officials paved the way for the systematic torture in in Guantánamo and Iraq by seeking to provide legal justification for the use of torture methods.
The "Bush Six", as the six US officials became known, includes David Addington (former Counsel to, and Chief of Staff for the former Vice President Dick Cheney); Jay Bybee (former Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, Department of Justice); Douglas Feith (former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy at the Department of Defense); Alberto Gonzales (former Counsel to President George W. Bush, former US Attorney General); William J. Haynes (former General Counsel at the Department of Defense) and John Yoo (former Deputy Assistant Attorney General at the Office of Legal Counsel within the Department of Justice).
Dossier: The US torture program – Approved at the hightest levels
Fact Sheet: Spanish investigations into US torture program
Bush Six: Amicus Curiae Brief to Supreme Court
Bush Six: Notice of Spain's Constitutional Court
Bush Six: Complaint to UN Special Rapporteur
Bush Six: Expert Opinion: Liability of six defendants
Bush Six: Expert opinion: Obligation to prosecute (Englisch)
Bush Six: Reply to US response
Bush Six: Submission to open investigation
Bush Six: US response
An amicus curiae brief is a submission to a court setting out a legal position.
Show MoreA dossier is a collection of documents that can be submitted to a court or other authority.
Show MoreThe Geneva Conventions form the basis of international humanitarian law. They protect certain categories of persons, e.g. civilians.
Show MorePublic international law is the system of laws governing relations between states and other subjects of international law.
Show MoreThe UN Convention against Torture was adopted to prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Show MoreUN Special Rapporteurs are appointed by the UN to work on a specific mandate.
Show MoreThe principle of universal jurisdiction provides for a state’s jurisdiction over crimes against international law even when the crimes did not occur on that state's territory.
Show MoreWar crimes are serious breaches of international humanitarian law committed in armed conflict.
Show MoreAn amicus curiae brief is a submission to a court setting out a legal position.
Show MoreDecision makers in Western democracies often apply double standards when it comes to human rights. While the Global North will condemn and in some cases prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the Global South, there is little appetite to examine the role played by Western politicians, military leaders and corporations in crimes against international law.
Show MoreThe law is clear: torture is prohibited under any circumstances. Whoever commits, orders or approves acts of torture should be prosecuted. This is set out in the UN Convention against Torture which has been ratified by 146 states.
Show MoreGuantánamo, Abu Ghraib, Bagram, secret detention centers in Eastern Europe; waterboarding, sleep deprivation, electric shocks – these are all symbols of a barbaric system of torture. Since 2004, ECCHR initiated several legal interventions against the US torture program.
Show MoreMass surveillance of their own citizens, drone strikes that kill civilians, the torture of detainees – these are just some of the crimes that for example the United States has overseen in recent years. For more than ten years, ECCHR has been taking legal action against systematic US torture and unlawful drone strikes committed by the US.
Show MoreDecision makers in Western democracies often apply double standards when it comes to human rights. While the Global North will condemn and in some cases prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the Global South, there is little appetite to examine the role played by Western politicians, military leaders and corporations in crimes against international law.
Show More