Definition
UN Convention against Torture
The UN Convention against Torture was adopted to prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Show MoreIn February 2011, former US President George W. Bush cancelled a public appearance in Geneva. Newspaper reports suggest the trip was called off amid fears of protests and the threat of criminal proceedings against him. ECCHR and the New York Center for Constitutional Rights had prepared criminal complaints in Geneva for two victims of the post 9/11 US torture program.
The two 2,500-page complaints were supported by more than 50 organizations from around the world as well as from Nobel Peace Prize winners Shirin Ebadi and Pérez Esquivel and former UN Special Rapporteurs Theo van Boven and Leandro Despouy.
The evidence includes documents concerning the torture program after 11 September 2001 with a particular focus on the liability of high ranking American officials, including former President Bush. Bush is accused of a number of crimes, including violations of the UN Convention against Torture.
The possibility of immunity for former heads of state is precluded in the case of torture. The Convention against Torture obliges member states to investigate suspected instances of torture, regardless of whether the allegations relate to former presidents or members of the government, secret services, the army or police forces.
As a signatory of the Convention against Torture, the US is obliged to prosecute for these crimes. Should those responsible for the torture program continue to avoid prosecution in the US, ECCHR and CCR will take all available steps to initiate proceedings elsewhere.
Dossier: The US torture program – Approved at the hightest levels
Preliminary "Indictment for Torture": George W. Bush
Exhibit List: George W. Bush
Denunciation Letter: George W. Bush
Press Release: Human Rights Groups Announce Bush Indictment for Convention Against Torture Signatory States (11 February 2011)
The UN Convention against Torture was adopted to prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Show MoreUN Special Rapporteurs are appointed by the UN to work on a specific mandate.
Show MoreThe UN Convention against Torture was adopted to prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Show MoreDecision makers in Western democracies often apply double standards when it comes to human rights. While the Global North will condemn and in some cases prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the Global South, there is little appetite to examine the role played by Western politicians, military leaders and corporations in crimes against international law.
Show MoreThe law is clear: torture is prohibited under any circumstances. Whoever commits, orders or approves acts of torture should be prosecuted. This is set out in the UN Convention against Torture which has been ratified by 146 states.
Show MoreGuantánamo, Abu Ghraib, Bagram, secret detention centers in Eastern Europe; waterboarding, sleep deprivation, electric shocks – these are all symbols of a barbaric system of torture. Since 2004, ECCHR initiated several legal interventions against the US torture program.
Show MoreMass surveillance of their own citizens, drone strikes that kill civilians, the torture of detainees – these are just some of the crimes that for example the United States has overseen in recent years. For more than ten years, ECCHR has been taking legal action against systematic US torture and unlawful drone strikes committed by the US.
Show MoreAttacks directed against civilians; torture of detainees; sexual slavery – when committed within the context of armed conflict, these and other grave crimes amount to war crimes as defined by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. While the system of international criminal justice makes it possible to prosecute war crimes, in many cases those responsible are not held to account.
Show MoreDecision makers in Western democracies often apply double standards when it comes to human rights. While the Global North will condemn and in some cases prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the Global South, there is little appetite to examine the role played by Western politicians, military leaders and corporations in crimes against international law.
Show More